There appears to be some disconnect between ABNF syntax and a prose. I.e. it
appears that ABNF requires at least 2 sub-domain parts, while prose discusses
"one or more dot-separated components". Which one is "more correct" and any
scenario when a single-component domain name can be valid / useful in modern
SMTP?
Thanks,
Yuri Inglikov
RFC2821:
Domain = (sub-domain 1*("." sub-domain)) / address-literal
sub-domain = Let-dig [Ldh-str]
It appears that BNF syntax in RFC2821 requires at least 2 sub-domain parts. On
the other hand the prose in the same RFC2821 discusses "one or more"
dot-separated parts:
2.3.5 Domain
A domain (or domain name) consists of one or more dot-separated
components. These components ("labels" in DNS terminology [22]) are
restricted for SMTP purposes to consist of a sequence of letters,
digits, and hyphens drawn from the ASCII character set [1]. Domain
names are used as names of hosts and of other entities in the domain
name hierarchy. For example, a domain may refer to an alias (label
of a CNAME RR) or the label of Mail eXchanger records to be used to
deliver mail instead of representing a host name. See [22] and
section 5 of this specification.
All other RFC's I checked appear to allow single-component domain names.