Re: RFC 2033 data responses for ESMTP (was: draft-hall-deferrals-00.txt)

On Tue, Jan 30, 2007, Tony Finch wrote:

> My main question about this draft is whether the extra complexity compared
> to LMTP is really useful. What is your rationale for it? I have considered
> writing a draft that simply defines how to turn on RFC 2033 data responses
> in SMTP, without specifying any significant new protocol features.
Can you write that draft? It seems there is sufficient interest to
do this.