IETF SMTP (date)
February 14, 2007
- Re: another per-recipient data reply proposal, Eric A. Hall, 16:37
- Re: another per-recipient data reply proposal, Tony Finch, 16:34
- Re: When to acknowledge messages for per-recipient data reply / deferred rcpt reply, Valdis . Kletnieks, 14:30
- Re: another per-recipient data reply proposal, Eric A. Hall, 11:28
- Re: checkpointing (was: another per-recipient data reply proposal), Tony Finch, 11:00
- Re: checkpointing (was: another per-recipient data reply proposal), Claus Assmann, 10:35
February 06, 2007
- Re: show of hands: which per-recipient data reply proposal?, Peter J. Holzer, 13:31
- show of hands: which per-recipient data reply proposal?, Claus Assmann, 12:05
- Re: another per-recipient data reply proposal, Eric A. Hall, 11:49
- Re: another per-recipient data reply proposal, Claus Assmann, 11:14
- Re: another per-recipient data reply proposal, Eric A. Hall, 10:53
- Re: another per-recipient data reply proposal, Claus Assmann, 02:00
February 04, 2007
- Re: another per-recipient data reply proposal, Claus Assmann, 21:03
- Re: another per-recipient data reply proposal, Eric A. Hall, 20:22
- Re: Overview of per-recipient data reply proposals, Eric A. Hall, 20:09
- Re: another per-recipient data reply proposal, Frank Ellermann, 19:50
- another per-recipient data reply proposal (was: Overview ...), Claus Assmann, 18:20
- Re: end of mail data response? (was: draft-hall-deferrals-00.txt), Claus Assmann, 18:06
- Re: draft-hall-deferrals-00.txt, Tony Finch, 17:21
- Re: Overview of per-recipient data reply proposals, Peter J. Holzer, 16:17
- Re: Advancing RFC2821 to Draft Standard -- outline of work, Frank Ellermann, 15:27
- Re: First vs. last -- Need and interest, Peter Bowyer, 14:50
- Re: First vs. last -- Need and interest, Claus Assmann, 14:29
- Re: First vs. last -- Need and interest, Eric A. Hall, 14:25
- Re: Overview of per-recipient data reply proposals, Eric A. Hall, 14:24
- Re: First vs. last -- Need and interest, Dave Crocker, 13:25
- Re: First vs. last -- Need and interest, Claus Assmann, 13:05
- Re: Advancing RFC2821 to Draft Standard -- outline of work, Dave Crocker, 13:03
- First vs. last -- Need and interest, Dave Crocker, 11:33
- Re: end of mail data response? (was: draft-hall-deferrals-00.txt), Peter J. Holzer, 11:22
- Overview of per-recipient data reply proposals (was: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hall-deferrals-00.txt), Peter J. Holzer, 10:44
- Re: end of mail data response? (was: draft-hall-deferrals-00.txt), Claus Assmann, 10:22
- Re: draft-hall-deferrals-00.txt, Claus Assmann, 08:57
- Re: draft-hall-deferrals-00.txt, Eric A. Hall, 08:21
- Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hall-deferrals-00.txt, Eric A. Hall, 08:11
- Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hall-deferrals-00.txt, Peter J. Holzer, 08:10
- Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hall-deferrals-00.txt, Peter J. Holzer, 04:49
February 01, 2007
- Re: RFC 2033 data responses for ESMTP (was: draft-hall-deferrals-00.txt), Claus Assmann, 18:01
- Re: draft-hall-deferrals-00.txt, John C Klensin, 17:15
- Re: draft-hall-deferrals-00.txt, ned+ietf-smtp, 16:02
- Re: greylisting done at end of headers, or end of daya (QUIT) ?, Hector Santos, 13:20
- Re: greylisting done at end of headers, or end of daya (QUIT) ?, Carl S. Gutekunst, 12:26
- Re: greylisting done at end of headers, or end of daya (QUIT) ?, Valdis . Kletnieks, 08:40
- Re: greylisting done at end of headers, or end of daya (QUIT) ?, Valdis . Kletnieks, 08:37
- Re: draft-hall-deferrals-00.txt, Alexey Melnikov, 06:06
- Re: greylisting done at end of headers, or end of daya (QUIT) ?, Tony Finch, 04:47