ietf-smtp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: checkpointing (was: another per-recipient data reply proposal)

2007-02-14 11:00:01

On Wed, 14 Feb 2007, Claus Assmann wrote:

As long as checkpointing is not a requirement for "per-recipient
data reply" but just mentioned as one possible solution to the
problem of duplicated mails, I'm fine with it. Requiring checkpointing
would keep people from implementing "per-recipient data reply" due
to the complexity of a possible checkpointing implementation.

Yes, I agree.

Tony.
-- 
f.a.n.finch  <dot(_at_)dotat(_dot_)at>  http://dotat.at/
CROMARTY FORTH TYNE: WESTERLY BACKING SOUTHERLY 5 OR 6, INCREASING 7. SLIGHT
OR MODERATE INCREASING ROUGH. MAINLY FAIR. GOOD.