<pseudo-chair hat on>
Adding language about a new 150 reply code in a multiline response would
be introducing new functionality to the spec and would be out of scope.
</pseudo-chair hat on>
Tony Hansen
tony(_at_)att(_dot_)com
Hector Santos wrote:
I would like to suggest one paragraph wording after the final paragraph
in 4.2.1:
Only the final or last reply-code is important in a multiline
response. The client MUST use the final line as the ultimate
server response. It is possible for a server to use a
preliminary reply code 150- as part of multiline response
with a final non-continuation completion code.