[Top] [All Lists]

Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 14 Continuation of 222 greeting and Issue 15 syntax for multiline replies

2007-04-10 12:43:10

<pseudo-chair hat on>

Adding language about a new 150 reply code in a multiline response would
be introducing new functionality to the spec and would be out of scope.

</pseudo-chair hat on>

        Tony Hansen

Hector Santos wrote:

I would like to suggest one paragraph wording after the final paragraph
in 4.2.1:

   Only the final or last reply-code is important in a multiline
   response. The client MUST use the final line as the ultimate
   server response.  It is possible for a server to use a
   preliminary reply code 150- as part of multiline response
   with a final non-continuation completion code.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>