IETF SMTP (thread)
Recap Issues 0b/21/25,
Tony Hansen,
2007/04/29
- Re: Recap Issues 0b/21/25, Hector Santos, 2007/04/29
- Re: Recap Issues 0b/21/25, Frank Ellermann, 2007/04/29
- Re: Recap Issues 0b/21/25, David F. Skoll, 2007/04/30
- Re: Recap Issues 0b/21/25, John Leslie, 2007/04/30
- Re: Recap Issues 0b/21/25, David F. Skoll, 2007/04/30
- Re: Recap Issues 0b/21/25, John Leslie, 2007/04/30
- Re: Recap Issues 0b/21/25, John C Klensin, 2007/04/30
- rfc2821bis-03 Issue 25: Re: Recap Issues 0b/21/25, John C Klensin, 2007/04/30
- Re: rfc2821bis-03 Issue 25: Re: Recap Issues 0b/21/25, David F. Skoll, 2007/04/30
- Re: rfc2821bis-03 Issue 25: Re: Recap Issues 0b/21/25, John C Klensin, 2007/04/30
- Re: rfc2821bis-03 Issue 25: Re: Recap Issues 0b/21/25, David F. Skoll, 2007/04/30
- Re: rfc2821bis-03 Issue 25: Re: Recap Issues 0b/21/25, John Leslie, 2007/04/30
- Re: rfc2821bis-03 Issue 25: Re: Recap Issues 0b/21/25, Frank Ellermann, 2007/04/30
- Re: rfc2821bis-03 Issue 25: Re: Recap Issues 0b/21/25, Frank Ellermann, 2007/04/30
- Re: rfc2821bis-03 Issue 25: Re: Recap Issues 0b/21/25, Frank Ellermann, 2007/04/30
- Re: rfc2821bis-03 Issue 25: Re: Recap Issues 0b/21/25, John Leslie, 2007/04/30
- Re: rfc2821bis-03 Issue 25: Re: Recap Issues 0b/21/25, Frank Ellermann, 2007/04/30
- Re: Recap Issues 0b/21/25, Robert A. Rosenberg, 2007/04/30
- Re: Recap Issues 0b/21/25, David F. Skoll, 2007/04/30
Issue list,
John C Klensin,
2007/04/26
- Re: Issue list, Hector Santos, 2007/04/26
- Re: Issue list, John C Klensin, 2007/04/27
- General-Address-Literal (was: Issue list), Frank Ellermann, 2007/04/29
- "for" clause on Received: header field (Re: General-Address-Literal (was: Issue list)), Kari Hurtta, 2007/04/29
- Re: "for" clause on Received: header field, Frank Ellermann, 2007/04/30
- Re: "for" clause on Received: header field, John C Klensin, 2007/04/30
- Re: "for" clause on Received: header field, Kari Hurtta, 2007/04/30
- Re: "for" clause on Received: header field, David F. Skoll, 2007/04/30
- Re: "for" clause on Received: header field, ned+ietf-smtp, 2007/04/30
- Re: "for" clause on Received: header field, Robert A. Rosenberg, 2007/04/30
- Re: "for" clause on Received: header field, John C Klensin, 2007/04/30
- Re: "for" clause on Received: header field, Frank Ellermann, 2007/04/30
- Re: "for" clause on Received: header field, Robert A. Rosenberg, 2007/04/30
- Re: General-Address-Literal (was: Issue list), John C Klensin, 2007/04/30
- Re: General-Address-Literal, Frank Ellermann, 2007/04/30
rfc2821bis-03 Issue 32: "MUST take responsibility",
John C Klensin,
2007/04/26
- Re: rfc2821bis-03 Issue 32: "MUST take responsibility", Jeff Macdonald, 2007/04/26
- Re: rfc2821bis-03 Issue 32: "MUST take responsibility", David F. Skoll, 2007/04/26
- Re: rfc2821bis-03 Issue 32: "MUST take responsibility", Jeff Macdonald, 2007/04/26
- Re: rfc2821bis-03 Issue 32: "MUST take responsibility", Hector Santos, 2007/04/26
- Re: rfc2821bis-03 Issue 32: "MUST take responsibility", David F. Skoll, 2007/04/26
- Re: rfc2821bis-03 Issue 32: "MUST take responsibility", Peter J. Holzer, 2007/04/26
- Re: rfc2821bis-03 Issue 32: "MUST take responsibility", Dave Crocker, 2007/04/26
- Re: rfc2821bis-03 Issue 32: "MUST take responsibility", David F. Skoll, 2007/04/26
- Re: rfc2821bis-03 Issue 32: "MUST take responsibility", Hector Santos, 2007/04/26
- Re: rfc2821bis-03 Issue 32: "MUST take responsibility", David F. Skoll, 2007/04/26
- Re: rfc2821bis-03 Issue 32: "MUST take responsibility", Frank Ellermann, 2007/04/26
- Re: rfc2821bis-03 Issue 32: "MUST take responsibility", Dave Crocker, 2007/04/26
- Re: rfc2821bis-03 Issue 32: "MUST take responsibility", Frank Ellermann, 2007/04/26
- Recap: Re: rfc2821bis-03 Issue 32: "MUST take responsibility", Tony Hansen, 2007/04/29
rfc2821bis-03: Issue 31: Retain new FTP comparison text in 4.2.1,
John C Klensin,
2007/04/26
- Re: rfc2821bis-03: Issue 31: Retain new FTP comparison text in 4.2.1, Chris Haynes, 2007/04/26
- Re: rfc2821bis-03: Issue 31: Retain new FTP comparison text in 4.2.1, Jeff Macdonald, 2007/04/26
- Re: rfc2821bis-03: Issue 31: Retain new FTP comparison text in 4.2.1, Hector Santos, 2007/04/26
- Re: rfc2821bis-03: Issue 31: Retain new FTP comparison text in 4.2.1, Frank Ellermann, 2007/04/26
- Re: rfc2821bis-03: Issue 31: Retain new FTP comparison text in 4.2.1, Alexey Melnikov, 2007/04/27
- Re: rfc2821bis-03: Issue 31: Retain new FTP comparison text in 4.2.1, John C Klensin, 2007/04/27
- Re[2]: rfc2821bis-03: Issue 31: Retain new FTP comparison text in 4.2.1, Chris Haynes, 2007/04/27
- Re: Re[2]: rfc2821bis-03: Issue 31: Retain new FTP comparison text in 4.2.1, John C Klensin, 2007/04/27
- Recap: Re: rfc2821bis-03: Issue 31: Retain new FTP comparison text in 4.2.1, Tony Hansen, 2007/04/29
- Re: Recap: Re: rfc2821bis-03: Issue 31: Retain new FTP comparison text in 4.2.1, John C Klensin, 2007/04/29
- Re: Recap: Re: rfc2821bis-03: Issue 31: Retain new FTP comparison text in 4.2.1, Tony Hansen, 2007/04/29
- Re: Recap: Re: rfc2821bis-03: Issue 31: Retain new FTP comparison text in 4.2.1, John C Klensin, 2007/04/30
- Re: Recap: Re: rfc2821bis-03: Issue 31: Retain new FTP comparison text in 4.2.1, Hector Santos, 2007/04/29
- Re: Recap: Re: rfc2821bis-03: Issue 31: Retain new FTP comparison text in 4.2.1, Mark E. Mallett, 2007/04/30
RFC2821bis-02 Issue 27: Received clauses,
Pete Resnick,
2007/04/23
- Re: RFC2821bis-02 Issue 27: Received clauses, Bruce Lilly, 2007/04/23
- Re: RFC2821bis-02 Issue 27: Received clauses, Pete Resnick, 2007/04/23
- Re: RFC2821bis-02 Issue 27: Received clauses, Tony Hansen, 2007/04/23
- Re: RFC2821bis-02 Issue 27: Received clauses, Kari Hurtta, 2007/04/23
- Re: RFC2821bis-02 Issue 27: Received clauses, Pete Resnick, 2007/04/23
- Re: RFC2821bis-02 Issue 27: Received clauses, Frank Ellermann, 2007/04/24
- Re: RFC2821bis-02 Issue 27: Received clauses, Paul Overell, 2007/04/24
- Re: RFC2821bis-02 Issue 27: Received clauses, Dave Crocker, 2007/04/24
- Re: RFC2821bis-02 Issue 27 (and 28): Received clauses, John C Klensin, 2007/04/24
- Re: RFC2821bis-02 Issue 27: Received clauses, Frank Ellermann, 2007/04/24
Section 4.4 - return-path,
SM,
2007/04/18
- RFC2821bis-02 Issue 22: Requiring removal of extra return-path headers in 4.4, John C Klensin, 2007/04/20
- Re: RFC2821bis-02 Issue 22: Requiring removal of extra return-path headers in 4.4, Frank Ellermann, 2007/04/22
- Re: RFC2821bis-02 Issue 22: Requiring removal of extra return-path headers in 4.4, John C Klensin, 2007/04/22
- Re: RFC2821bis-02 Issue 22: Requiring removal of extra return-path headers in 4.4, Hector Santos, 2007/04/22
- Re: RFC2821bis-02 Issue 22: Requiring removal of extra return-path headers in 4.4, Frank Ellermann, 2007/04/22
- Re: RFC2821bis-02 Issue 22: Requiring removal of extra return-path headers in 4.4, Hector Santos, 2007/04/22
- Re: RFC2821bis-02 Issue 22: Requiring removal of extra return-path headers in 4.4, John C Klensin, 2007/04/23
- Re: RFC2821bis-02 Issue 22: Requiring removal of extra return-path headers in 4.4, Hector Santos, 2007/04/23
- Recap: Re: RFC2821bis-02 Issue 22: Requiring removal of extra return-path headers in 4.4, Tony Hansen, 2007/04/29
rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies,
John C Klensin,
2007/04/10
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Tony Finch, 2007/04/10
- Message not available
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Hector Santos, 2007/04/10
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, David F. Skoll, 2007/04/10
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, william(at)elan.net, 2007/04/10
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, John C Klensin, 2007/04/10
- Message not available
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, John C Klensin, 2007/04/10
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Hector Santos, 2007/04/11
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, David F. Skoll, 2007/04/11
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Hector Santos, 2007/04/11
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, David F. Skoll, 2007/04/11
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Tony Finch, 2007/04/11
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Hector Santos, 2007/04/11
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, David F. Skoll, 2007/04/11
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, John C Klensin, 2007/04/11
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Hector Santos, 2007/04/11
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, David F. Skoll, 2007/04/11
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Hector Santos, 2007/04/11
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 2007/04/11
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Hector Santos, 2007/04/11
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 2007/04/12
- Window of opportunity (was: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies), Frank Ellermann, 2007/04/12
- Re: Window of opportunity, Tony Hansen, 2007/04/12
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, David F. Skoll, 2007/04/11
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, John C Klensin, 2007/04/11
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Hector Santos, 2007/04/11
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, John C Klensin, 2007/04/11
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Peter J. Holzer, 2007/04/12
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Hector Santos, 2007/04/12
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, David F. Skoll, 2007/04/12
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Hector Santos, 2007/04/12
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, David F. Skoll, 2007/04/12
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, and Issue 17: multiline reply codes, Tony Hansen, 2007/04/12
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 17: multiline reply codes, John C Klensin, 2007/04/12
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Claus Assmann, 2007/04/11
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Hector Santos, 2007/04/11
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, David F. Skoll, 2007/04/11
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Kari Hurtta, 2007/04/22
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Frank Ellermann, 2007/04/22
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Hector Santos, 2007/04/22
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Hector Santos, 2007/04/22
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, David F. Skoll, 2007/04/22
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Hector Santos, 2007/04/22
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, David F. Skoll, 2007/04/22
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Frank Ellermann, 2007/04/22
- Nitpicking typos (was: Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies), John C Klensin, 2007/04/22
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Tony Hansen, 2007/04/22
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Hector Santos, 2007/04/23
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Tony Hansen, 2007/04/23
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Tony Hansen, 2007/04/23
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Hector Santos, 2007/04/23
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Hector Santos, 2007/04/23
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, David F. Skoll, 2007/04/23
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Hector Santos, 2007/04/23
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Tony Hansen, 2007/04/23
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, John C Klensin, 2007/04/23
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Philip Guenther, 2007/04/23
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Frank Ellermann, 2007/04/24
- Re: rfc2821bis-02 Issue 24 (was: Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies), John C Klensin, 2007/04/24
- Re: rfc2821bis-02 Issue 24, Hector Santos, 2007/04/24
- Re: rfc2821bis-02 Issue 24, John C Klensin, 2007/04/24
- General-Address-Literal (was: rfc2821bis-02 Issue 24), Frank Ellermann, 2007/04/24
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, David F. Skoll, 2007/04/23
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, ned+ietf-smtp, 2007/04/23
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Claus Assmann, 2007/04/23
- Registration rules for extensions (was: Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies), John C Klensin, 2007/04/22
- Re: Registration rules for extensions, Frank Ellermann, 2007/04/22
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, John C Klensin, 2007/04/22
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Hector Santos, 2007/04/22
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Peter J. Holzer, 2007/04/22
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Hector Santos, 2007/04/22
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, David F. Skoll, 2007/04/22
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Hector Santos, 2007/04/22
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, David F. Skoll, 2007/04/23
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Hector Santos, 2007/04/23
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, John C Klensin, 2007/04/23
- New issue (was Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies), David F. Skoll, 2007/04/23
- Re: New issue (was Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies), ned+ietf-smtp, 2007/04/23
- Re: New issue (was Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies), John C Klensin, 2007/04/23
- Re: New issue (was Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies), David F. Skoll, 2007/04/23
- Re: New issue (was Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies), Robert A. Rosenberg, 2007/04/23
- Re: New issue (was Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies), Hector Santos, 2007/04/23
- Re: New issue (was Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies), David F. Skoll, 2007/04/23
- Re: New issue (was Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies), Hector Santos, 2007/04/23
- Re: New issue (was Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies), Philip Guenther, 2007/04/23
- Re: New issue (was Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies), John C Klensin, 2007/04/23
- Re: New issue (was Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies), ned+ietf-smtp, 2007/04/23
- Re: New issue (was Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies), John C Klensin, 2007/04/24
- Re: New issue (was Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies), Hector Santos, 2007/04/23
- Re: New issue (was Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies), Arnt Gulbrandsen, 2007/04/23
- Re: New issue (was Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies), Jeff Macdonald, 2007/04/23
- RFC2821bis-02 Issue 28: Client behavior on unrecognized reply code (was: Re: New issue...), John C Klensin, 2007/04/23
- Re: RFC2821bis-02 Issue 28: Client behavior on unrecognized reply code, Tony Hansen, 2007/04/23
- Re: RFC2821bis-02 Issue 28: Client behavior on unrecognized reply code, Frank Ellermann, 2007/04/24
- Re: RFC2821bis-02 Issue 28: Client behavior on unrecognized reply code, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 2007/04/24
- Re: RFC2821bis-02 Issue 28: Client behavior on unrecognized reply code, Hector Santos, 2007/04/24
- Re: RFC2821bis-02 Issue 28: Client behavior on unrecognized reply code, ned+ietf-smtp, 2007/04/24
- Re: RFC2821bis-02 Issue 28: Client behavior on unrecognized reply code, Peter J. Holzer, 2007/04/25
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Frank Ellermann, 2007/04/22
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, John C Klensin, 2007/04/23
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Peter J. Holzer, 2007/04/25
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Peter J. Holzer, 2007/04/22
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Hector Santos, 2007/04/22
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Frank Ellermann, 2007/04/11
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies, Hector Santos, 2007/04/10
rfc2821bis-01 Issue 17: all contination lines must use same code,
John C Klensin,
2007/04/10
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 17: all contination lines must use same code, David F. Skoll, 2007/04/10
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 17: all contination lines must use same code, Jeff Macdonald, 2007/04/10
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 17: all contination lines must use same code, Tony Finch, 2007/04/10
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 17: all contination lines must use same code, Tony Hansen, 2007/04/10
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 17: all contination lines must use same code, Hector Santos, 2007/04/10
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 17: all contination lines must use same code, David F. Skoll, 2007/04/10
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 17: all contination lines must use same code, Hector Santos, 2007/04/10
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 17: all contination lines must use same code, David F. Skoll, 2007/04/10
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 17: all contination lines must use same code, Tony Finch, 2007/04/11
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 17: all contination lines must use same code, Hector Santos, 2007/04/11
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 17: all contination lines must use same code, Tony Finch, 2007/04/11
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 17: all contination lines must use same code, Hector Santos, 2007/04/11
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 17: all contination lines must use same code, Philip Guenther, 2007/04/11
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 17: all contination lines must use same code, Philip Guenther, 2007/04/11
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 17: all contination lines must use same code, John C Klensin, 2007/04/11
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 17: all contination lines must use same code, Hector Santos, 2007/04/11
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 17: all contination lines must use same code, John C Klensin, 2007/04/11
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 17: all contination lines must use same code, Hector Santos, 2007/04/11
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 17: all contination lines must use same code, Lisa Dusseault, 2007/04/12
- Re: recap rfc2821bis-01 Issue 17: all contination lines must use same code, Tony Hansen, 2007/04/11
- Re: recap rfc2821bis-01 Issue 17: all contination lines must use same code, David F. Skoll, 2007/04/11
- Re: recap rfc2821bis-01 Issue 17: all contination lines must use same code, Hector Santos, 2007/04/11
- Re: recap rfc2821bis-01 Issue 17: all contination lines must use same code, Frank Ellermann, 2007/04/11
- Re: recap rfc2821bis-01 Issue 17: all contination lines must use same code, Tony Finch, 2007/04/11
- Re: recap rfc2821bis-01 Issue 17: all contination lines must use same code, Jeff Macdonald, 2007/04/11
- Re: recap rfc2821bis-01 Issue 17: all contination lines must use same code, Claus Assmann, 2007/04/11
- Re: recap rfc2821bis-01 Issue 17: all contination lines must use same code, John C Klensin, 2007/04/11
- Re: recap rfc2821bis-01 Issue 17: all contination lines must use same code, SM, 2007/04/11
- Re: recap rfc2821bis-01 Issue 17: all contination lines must use same code, Robert A. Rosenberg, 2007/04/12
- Re: recap rfc2821bis-01 Issue 17: all contination lines must use same code, Peter J. Holzer, 2007/04/13
- Re: recap rfc2821bis-01 Issue 17: all contination lines must use same code, John Leslie, 2007/04/13
- Re: recap rfc2821bis-01 Issue 17: all contination lines must use same code, Peter J. Holzer, 2007/04/13
- Re: recap rfc2821bis-01 Issue 17: all contination lines must use same code, Hector Santos, 2007/04/13
- Re: recap rfc2821bis-01 Issue 17: all contination lines must use same code, John C Klensin, 2007/04/13
- Re: recap rfc2821bis-01 Issue 17: all contination lines must use same code, Hector Santos, 2007/04/13
- Re: recap rfc2821bis-01 Issue 17: all contination lines must use same code, John Leslie, 2007/04/13
Re: Conflicting Enhanced Status Codes between RFC 4468 and draft-siemborski-rfc2554bis,
Tony Hansen,
2007/04/09
- Re: Conflicting Enhanced Status Codes between RFC 4468 and draft-siemborski-rfc2554bis, Alexey Melnikov, 2007/04/10
- Re: Conflicting Enhanced Status Codes between RFC 4468 and draft-siemborski-rfc2554bis, ned+ietf-smtp, 2007/04/10
- Re: Conflicting Enhanced Status Codes between RFC 4468 and draft-siemborski-rfc2554bis, Frank Ellermann, 2007/04/10
- Re: Conflicting Enhanced Status Codes between RFC 4468 and draft-siemborski-rfc2554bis, ned+ietf-smtp, 2007/04/10
- Re: Conflicting Enhanced Status Codes between RFC 4468 and draft-siemborski-rfc2554bis, Alexey Melnikov, 2007/04/10
- Re: Conflicting Enhanced Status Codes between RFC 4468 and draft-siemborski-rfc2554bis, ned+ietf-smtp, 2007/04/10
- Re: Conflicting Enhanced Status Codes between RFC 4468 and draft-siemborski-rfc2554bis, Alexey Melnikov, 2007/04/11
- Re: Conflicting Enhanced Status Codes between RFC 4468 and draft-siemborski-rfc2554bis, John C Klensin, 2007/04/11
- Re: Conflicting Enhanced Status Codes between RFC 4468 and draft-siemborski-rfc2554bis, Frank Ellermann, 2007/04/10
- Re: Conflicting Enhanced Status Codes between RFC 4468 and draft-siemborski-rfc2554bis, ned+ietf-smtp, 2007/04/10
- Re: Conflicting Enhanced Status Codes between RFC 4468 and draft-siemborski-rfc2554bis, John C Klensin, 2007/04/11
- Re: Conflicting Enhanced Status Codes between RFC 4468 and draft-siemborski-rfc2554bis, ned+ietf-smtp, 2007/04/11
- Re: Conflicting Enhanced Status Codes between RFC 4468 and draft-siemborski-rfc2554bis, Frank Ellermann, 2007/04/11
- Re: Conflicting Enhanced Status Codes between RFC 4468 and draft-siemborski-rfc2554bis, ned+ietf-smtp, 2007/04/15
- Re: Conflicting Enhanced Status Codes between RFC 4468 and draft-siemborski-rfc2554bis, Frank Ellermann, 2007/04/15
- Re: Conflicting Enhanced Status Codes between RFC 4468 and draft-siemborski-rfc2554bis, ned+ietf-smtp, 2007/04/15
- Re: Conflicting Enhanced Status Codes between RFC 4468 and draft-siemborski-rfc2554bis, Frank Ellermann, 2007/04/17
- Re: Conflicting Enhanced Status Codes between RFC 4468 and draft-siemborski-rfc2554bis, ned+ietf-smtp, 2007/04/17
- Re: Conflicting Enhanced Status Codes between RFC 4468 and draft-siemborski-rfc2554bis, John C Klensin, 2007/04/11
- Re: Conflicting Enhanced Status Codes between RFC 4468 and draft-siemborski-rfc2554bis, ned+ietf-smtp, 2007/04/11
- Re: Conflicting Enhanced Status Codes between RFC 4468 and draft-siemborski-rfc2554bis, Tony Hansen, 2007/04/10
- Re: Conflicting Enhanced Status Codes between RFC 4468 and draft-siemborski-rfc2554bis, Robert A. Rosenberg, 2007/04/10
- Re: Conflicting Enhanced Status Codes between RFC 4468 and draft-siemborski-rfc2554bis, Chris Newman, 2007/04/11
2821bis server reply ABNF,
Tony Finch,
2007/04/05
- Re: 2821bis server reply ABNF, Frank Ellermann, 2007/04/05
- rfc2821bis-01 Issue 14 Continuation of 222 greeting and Issue 15 syntax for multiline replies (was: Re: 2821bis server reply ABNF), John C Klensin, 2007/04/06
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 14 Continuation of 222 greeting and Issue 15 syntax for multiline replies (was: Re: 2821bis server reply ABNF), Tony Finch, 2007/04/06
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 14 Continuation of 222 greeting, John C Klensin, 2007/04/06
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 14 Continuation of 222 greeting and Issue 15 syntax for multiline replies, Tony Hansen, 2007/04/06
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 14 Continuation of 222 greeting and Issue 15 syntax for multiline replies, Hector Santos, 2007/04/06
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 14 Continuation of 222 greeting and Issue 15 syntax for multiline replies, John C Klensin, 2007/04/07
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 14 Continuation of 222 greeting and Issue 15 syntax for multiline replies, Hector Santos, 2007/04/07
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 14 Continuation of 222 greeting and Issue 15 syntax for multiline replies, Tony Hansen, 2007/04/07
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 14 Continuation of 222 greeting and Issue 15 syntax for multiline replies, Frank Ellermann, 2007/04/08
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 14 Continuation of 222 greeting and Issue 15 syntax for multiline replies, Hector Santos, 2007/04/09
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 14 Continuation of 222 greeting and Issue 15 syntax for multiline replies, Frank Ellermann, 2007/04/09
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 14 Continuation of 222 greeting and Issue 15 syntax for multiline replies, Hector Santos, 2007/04/10
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 14 Continuation of 222 greeting and Issue 15 syntax for multiline replies, Tony Finch, 2007/04/10
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 14 Continuation of 222 greeting and Issue 15 syntax for multiline replies, Hector Santos, 2007/04/10
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 14 Continuation of 222 greeting and Issue 15 syntax for multiline replies, Tony Finch, 2007/04/10
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 14 Continuation of 222 greeting and Issue 15 syntax for multiline replies, Hector Santos, 2007/04/10
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 14 Continuation of 222 greeting and Issue 15 syntax for multiline replies, Tony Finch, 2007/04/10
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 14 Continuation of 222 greeting and Issue 15 syntax for multiline replies, Hector Santos, 2007/04/10
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 14 Continuation of 222 greeting and Issue 15 syntax for multiline replies, Robert A. Rosenberg, 2007/04/10
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 14 Continuation of 222 greeting and Issue 15 syntax for multiline replies, John C Klensin, 2007/04/10
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 14 Continuation of 222 greeting and Issue 15 syntax for multiline replies, Tony Finch, 2007/04/11
- 15 syntax for multiline replies, Hector Santos, 2007/04/10
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 14 Continuation of 222 greeting and Issue 15 syntax for multiline replies, John C Klensin, 2007/04/10
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 14 Continuation of 222 greeting and Issue 15 syntax for multiline replies, Hector Santos, 2007/04/10
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 14 Continuation of 222 greeting and Issue 15 syntax for multiline replies, John C Klensin, 2007/04/10
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 14 Continuation of 222 greeting and Issue 15 syntax for multiline replies, Lisa Dusseault, 2007/04/12
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 14 Continuation of 222 greeting and Issue 15 syntax for multiline replies, Hector Santos, 2007/04/12
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 14 Continuation of 222 greeting and Issue 15 syntax for multiline replies, Tony Hansen, 2007/04/10
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 14 Continuation of 222 greeting and Issue 15 syntax for multiline replies, Hector Santos, 2007/04/10
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 14 Continuation of 222 greeting and Issue 15 syntax for multiline replies, Tony Hansen, 2007/04/10
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 14 Continuation of 222 greeting and Issue 15 syntax for multiline replies, John C Klensin, 2007/04/08
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 14 Continuation of 222 greeting and Issue 15 syntax for multiline replies, Hector Santos, 2007/04/08
- Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 14 Continuation of 222 greeting and Issue 15 syntax for multiline replies, Hector Santos, 2007/04/07