Tony Finch wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007, Tony Hansen wrote:
(iii) Prohibit different codes and, optionally, suggest
that it is ok for a client to select one of them and
assume that all of the others are the same.
http://www.imc.org/ietf-smtp/mail-archive/msg03247.html
My reasons are that (iia) and (iib) are unacceptable because of running
code, and (i) has lead to interoperability problems which I understand
this revision effort aims to minimise.
+1.