John C Klensin wrote:
>
> That is a long-winded way of saying that I've gradually become
> convinced that (iii) is the only plausible and responsible
> option.
And its the worst decision you can make. You will hurting progress, not
helping it and I strong say that as one of the long time commercial SMTP
developer. You gain absolutely nothing here with (iii) and it will
goes against 25 years of time tested last line reply code logic.
Terrible decision, I'm completely flabbergasted by all this.
--
HLS