Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 12: IPv6 MX records and transitions

ietf-smtp

2007-04-11 17:17:07

from [SM]


At 12:19 11-04-2007, Frank Ellermann wrote:

Addition:  John's proposed changes match your suggestions.
That won't solve the "IPv6 only" problem, but it fixes all
missing AAAA cases.

The aim was to fix the "AAAA" case which you pointed out. Solving the"IPv6 only" problem is a whole new ballgame. :)


Regards,
-sm

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 12: IPv6 MX records and transitions (was: Re: IPv6), SM Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 12: IPv6 MX records and transitions, Frank Ellermann Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 12: IPv6 MX records and transitions, Hector Santos Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 12: IPv6 MX records and transitions, SM Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 12: IPv6 MX records and transitions, Frank Ellermann Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 12: IPv6 MX records and transitions, SM <=

Previous by Date:	Re: recap rfc2821bis-01 Issue 17: all contination lines must use same code, Hector Santos
Next by Date:	Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 12: IPv6 MX records and transitions, SM
Previous by Thread:	Re: RFC2821bis-01 Issue 12: IPv6 MX records and transitions, Frank Ellermann
Next by Thread:	Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies -- proposed text, John C Klensin
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]