Re: rfc2821bis-01 Issue 18: Usability of 1yz replies

On 2007-04-20 18:33:41 +0300, Kari Hurtta wrote:
> John C Klensin <john+smtp(_at_)jck(_dot_)com> writes in gmane.ietf.smtp:
> > --On Tuesday, 10 April, 2007 15:23 -0400 Hector Santos
> > <hsantos(_at_)santronics(_dot_)com> wrote:
> > > Second, there is no restriction in using it as part of a
> > > continuation line.  Example:
> > >
> > >      C: DATA
> > >      S: 352 Begin sending your data
> > >         [client uploads data]
> > >      S: 150-DKIM signature found!
> > >      S: 150-Please wait while we process your DKIM message!
> > >      S: 150-Waiting for trust server to respond...
> > >      S: 150-Still waiting for trust server to respond...
> > >      C: 550-Sorry, The DKIM POLICY has failed this transaction
> > >      C: 550 Please see http://trust-r-us.com/msgid=123213123
[...]
> Perhaps off topic, but it seems that sendmail uses 0xx
> with similar way if VERB command is given
>
> VERB
> 250 2.0.0 Verbose mode
> MAIL FROM:<hurtta(_at_)localhost>
> 250 2.1.0 <hurtta(_at_)localhost>... Sender ok
> RCPT TO:<root>
> 050 <root>... aliased to hurtta
> 250 2.1.5 <root>... Recipient ok
But note an important difference: There is no "-" after "050", so the
RCPT command returns two results (050 and 250) in this case, not a
single result with conflicting return codes. LMTP and draft-hall-prdr
extend the data command in a similar way.

        hp

-- 
   _  | Peter J. Holzer    | I know I'd be respectful of a pirate 
|_|_) | Sysadmin WSR       | with an emu on his shoulder.
| |   | hjp(_at_)hjp(_dot_)at         |
__/   | http://www.hjp.at/ |    -- Sam in "Freefall"

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature