John Leslie wrote:
"Reject at the border" is already becoming a normal practice: be
patient...
Cando if 2821bis helps to encourage it... :-)
We cannot presume universal use of SPF.
Yes, it would be also against the spirit of voluntary deployment.
For a "worldwide upgrade FUSSP" it's too complex, if that would
be possible (it's not) it could be done with a simpler technique.
OTOH, I could live with your wording...
Which of the three proposed qualifiers does the trick for you ?
For the "normal" case (in my parallel universe that's an SPF PASS
or a similar case :-) I'd like to keep the "MUST bounce" as it was.
Don't hang on too tight to that horse -- it's pining for the
fjords... :^(
Yes. We've to find a course between Scylla "accept + bounce" and
Charybdis "accept + silently drop". And there's a common factor
in both undesirable outcomes. <eg>
Frank