Recap: Re: RFC2821bis-02 Issue 23: Definitions in Section 2.3 and "comma

John C Klensin wrote:
> It has been pointed out that Section 2.3 contains a definition
> for "Reply" (in 2.3.11) but no parallel definition for
> "Command".  Is this worth fixing?
The consensus on this issue appears to be yes. Whether this is
accomplished via ABNF changes or strictly via textual definitions is
subject to other issues.

        Tony Hansen
        tony(_at_)att(_dot_)com