John C Klensin wrote:
(4) Have me go through the document, identify the
protocol-specific ones, and change them to
MAY/SHOULD/MUST as appropriate. This would leave
readers needing to check those choices using a diff or
equivalent and objecting if needed.
+1, with the suggestion that non-normative uses of language that implies
permission be changed to language that describes choice. For example, A is
permitted... could become A might choose to...
The issue, here, is word-smithing to remove potential misunderstanding. That
takes diligent technical editing, not group discussion.