Re: Conflicting Enhanced Status Codes between RFC 4468 and draft

ned+ietf-smtp(_at_)mrochek(_dot_)com wrote:

> > 5.7.8, 5.7.9, 5.7.11, 4,7.12, 5.7.12, and x.5.6.
> >    
> All of these have are consistently defined in 2554bis and in Tony's draft. If
> Tony's draft moves forward and is approved before 2554bis
This wouldn't be possible, as 2554bis is already approved ;-).

> is published 2554bis
> will need to be revised to use the proper registration templates. But this can
> easily be done with an RFC Editor note.