Re: Explained-literal2007-04-12 13:32:00John C Klensin wrote: I'm happy to assign an issue number if others believe the decision needs revisiting. Please add it to the list of things that have to be checked thoroughly in the implementation and interoperability report. I hope that EXPN and VRFY are already on this list. If the result is that <explained-literal> isn't used or is in practice unusable it could be removed. That would be sad. Frank
|
|