[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Explained-literal

2007-04-12 13:32:00

John C Klensin wrote:

I'm happy to assign an issue number if others believe the
decision needs revisiting.

Please add it to the list of things that have to be checked
thoroughly in the implementation and interoperability report.
I hope that EXPN and VRFY are already on this list.  

If the result is that <explained-literal> isn't used or is
in practice unusable it could be removed.  That would be sad.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>