[Top] [All Lists]

Re: MX to CNAME and (mis)interptretation of 2821

2007-12-12 16:27:08

Trevor Paquette wrote:

Would it also be possible to state directly within the next
revision of the RFC where or not this RFC overrides the 
provision 10.3 of RFC 2181.

The Last Call for 2821bis ends 2007-12-24:

<> is 2821bis,
and <> is
a copy of the running Last Call.

I don't want to leave things left to misinterpretation.

I've seen at least one flamewar about this on another list.