Paul Smith wrote:
Hector Santos wrote:
D, continue to try USER2, as that transaction was delayed.
Glenn's answer assumes USER1 will be getting the message here.
No. He assumes USER1 will NOT be getting the message, and never will, so
there's no point in retrying it.
He believes (as I do) that you can't assume the same about USER2, so you
should retry that.
I'm 100% with Glenn here.
Thats fine, I don't - I mean I don't agree with the logic here under a
DATA 5zy retry condition for user2. I believe it is wrong and will
break client software.
I think a single message delivery attempt with N (N>1) recipients should
behave exactly identically to N delivery attempts each with a single
recipient. Glenn's method works for that, yours doesn't.
False. I suggest it will break more client software retry logic than not.
Go back to the original topic with Tony Finch post. Start from there.
--
Sincerely
Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com