IETF SMTP (date)

IETF SMTP (date)

[Thread Index] [Top] [All Lists]

August 19, 2008

Re: retry question, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 09:02

August 16, 2008

Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), ned+ietf-smtp, 09:07
Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), John C Klensin, 07:47

August 15, 2008

Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), Hector Santos, 19:33
Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), ned+ietf-smtp, 18:30

August 14, 2008

Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), Hector Santos, 11:14
Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), Tony Finch, 05:45

August 13, 2008

Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), John C Klensin, 20:32
DATA reply codes - which ones?, Hector Santos, 18:40
Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), John C Klensin, 17:37
Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), Hector Santos, 17:31
Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), Tony Hansen, 16:29
Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), Bart Schaefer, 15:33
Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), Frank Ellermann, 11:40
Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), Tony Finch, 10:24
Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), Frank Ellermann, 10:11
Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), Tony Finch, 09:09

August 12, 2008

Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), Hector Santos, 17:58
Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), John C Klensin, 13:39
Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), Bart Schaefer, 12:56
Re: SendMail follows a NO RETRY 5yz logic as defined by specs., Philip Guenther, 11:32
Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), John C Klensin, 10:34
Re: Retry Strategies, John C Klensin, 09:13
Re: Retry Strategies, Paul Smith, 05:24
Re: SendMail follows a NO RETRY 5yz logic as defined by specs., Frank Ellermann, 05:24
Re: SendMail follows a NO RETRY 5yz logic as defined by specs., Hector Santos, 03:42
Retry Strategies, Hector Santos, 02:53
Re: SendMail follows a NO RETRY 5yz logic as defined by specs., Frank Ellermann, 02:32

August 11, 2008

Re: SendMail follows a NO RETRY 5yz logic as defined by specs., Philip Guenther, 23:19
Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), Hector Santos, 21:41
Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not., Glenn Anderson, 15:28
Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), John R Levine, 12:45
Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), Jeff Macdonald, 12:42
Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not., Alessandro Vesely, 12:09
Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), Paul Smith, 10:29
Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), SM, 09:58
Signalling to retry RCPTs separately, John Leslie, 09:16
Re: retry question, Tony Finch, 08:20
Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), Hector Santos, 08:14
retries redux? was Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not., Tony Finch, 08:08
Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) (was: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis)), SM, 08:07
Re: SendMail follows a NO RETRY 5yz logic as defined by specs., SM, 08:06
Re: retry question, Paul Smith, 08:02
Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), John Leslie, 07:47
Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not., Tony Finch, 06:48
Re: retry question, Tony Finch, 06:46
Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not., Paul Smith, 06:34
Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not., Paul Smith, 06:15
Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not., Hector Santos, 03:05
Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not., Hector Santos, 03:01
Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not., Paul Smith, 02:25
Re: SendMail follows a NO RETRY 5yz logic as defined by specs., Frank Ellermann, 02:21
Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not., Paul Smith, 02:01
Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) (was: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis)), Paul Smith, 01:55
Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), Paul Smith, 01:54
Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not., Alessandro Vesely, 01:22
SendMail follows a NO RETRY 5yz logic as defined by specs., Hector Santos, 00:44

August 10, 2008

Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), Hector Santos, 23:40
Re: retry question, SM, 23:07
Re: retry question, SM, 23:07
Re: retry question, SM, 23:06
Re: retry question, SM, 23:06
Re: Retry question, Hector Santos, 20:22
Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), Hector Santos, 19:03
Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), Frank Ellermann, 18:05
Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) (was: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis)), Hector Santos, 18:02
Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) (was: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis)), Hector Santos, 17:56
Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) (was: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis)), Dave Crocker, 17:13
Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) (was: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis)), John C Klensin, 17:06
Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) (was: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis)), Glenn Anderson, 16:21
Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) (was: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis)), ned+ietf-smtp, 15:33
Re: Retry question, Tony Finch, 14:39
Re: Retry question, Pete Resnick, 13:51
Re: Retry question, Hector Santos, 13:23
Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) (was: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis)), Hector Santos, 13:03
Re: Retry question, Pete Resnick, 12:33
Re: Retry question, Bill McQuillan, 11:35
Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) (was: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis)), ned+ietf-smtp, 11:27
Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not., ned+ietf-smtp, 11:07
Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not., Hector Santos, 09:45
Re: Retry question, Pete Resnick, 09:37
Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios, Hector Santos, 09:31
2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) (was: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis)), Frank Ellermann, 09:20
Re: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis), Glenn Anderson, 09:20
Re: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis), Hector Santos, 08:50
Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not., Glenn Anderson, 08:47
Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not., Hector Santos, 08:35
Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios, Glenn Anderson, 08:32
Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios, Hector Santos, 08:24
Re: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis), ned+ietf-smtp, 07:46
Re: DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not., ned+ietf-smtp, 07:29
Re: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis), Hector Santos, 06:59
Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios, Glenn Anderson, 06:47
DATA 554 responses - To Retry or Not., Hector Santos, 06:46
Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios, Hector Santos, 06:26
Re: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis), John C Klensin, 06:06
Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios, Glenn Anderson, 05:31
Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios, Hector Santos, 05:24
Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios, Glenn Anderson, 04:22
Re: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis), Hector Santos, 00:40
Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios, Hector Santos, 00:24

August 09, 2008

Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios, Glenn Anderson, 23:09
Re: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis), Bill McQuillan, 23:08
Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios, Hector Santos, 22:52
2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis), Hector Santos, 21:56
Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios, Glenn Anderson, 21:48
Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios, Hector Santos, 21:29
Re: Pipelining the DATA Command, ned+ietf-smtp, 21:27
Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), ned+ietf-smtp, 21:06
Re: retry question, ned+ietf-smtp, 21:02
Re: Pipelining the DATA Command, Glenn Anderson, 20:58
Re: retry question, Hector Santos, 20:41
Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), Robert A. Rosenberg, 20:19
Pipelining the DATA Command, Robert A. Rosenberg, 20:17
Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures, Hector Santos, 19:41
Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios, Glenn Anderson, 19:31
Re: retry question, Frank Ellermann, 19:25
Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios, Hector Santos, 19:22
Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios, Hector Santos, 19:05
Re: retry question, Hector Santos, 18:20
Re: retry question, SM, 17:11
Re: retry question, SM, 16:55
Re: retry question, Robert A. Rosenberg, 15:26
Re: retry question, Robert A. Rosenberg, 15:25
Re: retry question, Frank Ellermann, 13:01
Re: retry question, John C Klensin, 12:10
Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), Paul Smith, 10:59
Re: retry question, ned+ietf-smtp, 10:40
Re: retry question, Frank Ellermann, 09:37
Re: retry question, Tony Finch, 09:32
Re: retry question, John Leslie, 09:26
Re: Improved straw man for retry scenarios, Frank Ellermann, 08:37
Re: retry question (was: 2821bis/ter and procedures), ned+ietf-smtp, 08:19
Re: retry question, ned+ietf-smtp, 08:09
Improved straw man for retry scenarios, John Levine, 07:48
Re: retry question, Frank Ellermann, 07:15
Re: retry question, Hector Santos, 06:05
retry question (was: 2821bis/ter and procedures), SM, 05:18
Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures, Richard Kay, 04:43
Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), Alex van den Bogaerdt, 00:55
Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), Alex van den Bogaerdt, 00:54
Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), Alex van den Bogaerdt, 00:53
Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), Alex van den Bogaerdt, 00:38

August 08, 2008

Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), Hector Santos, 23:22
Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures, Hector Santos, 20:56
Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), SM, 20:06
Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), SM, 19:38
Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), Hector Santos, 16:54
Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures, Hector Santos, 15:42
Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), SM, 15:08
Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), ned+ietf-smtp, 14:16
Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures, Hector Santos, 12:48
Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), Hector Santos, 12:24
Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures, Tony Finch, 11:50
Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures, Frank Ellermann, 11:22
Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), Tony Finch, 10:33
Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), John R Levine, 10:31
Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), Tony Finch, 10:02
Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures, Tony Finch, 09:29
Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures, Paul Smith, 08:07
Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), Paul Smith, 08:06
Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), ned+ietf-smtp, 06:50
Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), ned+ietf-smtp, 06:32
Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), John R Levine, 06:06
Re: Forwarding in the face of spam, Keith Moore, 05:44
Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), Richard Kay, 03:45

August 07, 2008

Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), John Levine, 22:40
2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), John C Klensin, 07:24
Re: retry question, Tony Finch, 03:36
Re: retry question, Hector Santos, 02:12

August 06, 2008

Re: retry question, Hector Santos, 15:29
Re: retry question, SM, 15:03
Re: retry question, Tony Finch, 10:28
Re: retry question, ned+ietf-smtp, 07:44
Re: retry question, Tony Finch, 04:19
Re: retry question, Hector Santos, 03:56
Re: retry question, SM, 02:42

August 05, 2008

Re: retry question, Hector Santos, 17:49
Re: retry question, ned+ietf-smtp, 16:42
Re: retry question, Hector Santos, 16:19
Re: retry question, Hector Santos, 16:05
Re: retry question, Hector Santos, 15:48
Re: retry question, Hector Santos, 15:29
Re: retry question, ned+ietf-smtp, 14:48
Re: retry question, Tony Finch, 12:06
Re: retry question, SM, 11:56
retry question, Tony Finch, 10:01