Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures


John C Klensin wrote:John C Klensin wrote:

So either put these clarifications into a separate draft and try
to advance it or start thinking carefully about what you are
wishing for.

I'd say this should be an informative or BCP document. Putting it in a'standards' document runs the risk of suddenly making lots of currentlycompliant software not compliant any more, even though they're workingfine..

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) (was: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis)), (continued) Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) (was: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis)), Dave Crocker Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) (was: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis)), Glenn Anderson Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) (was: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis)), Hector Santos Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) (was: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis)), John C Klensin Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?) (was: 2821 5yz Typo - Client Retry Gaffe (fixed in 2821bis)), Hector Santos Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), Frank Ellermann Re: 2821bis AUTH48 fix (?), Hector Santos Re: retry question (was: 2821bis/ter and procedures), ned+ietf-smtp Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), Alex van den Bogaerdt Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question), Alex van den Bogaerdt Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures, Paul Smith <= Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures, Tony Finch Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures, Hector Santos Re: retry question, Tony Finch Re: Retry question, Pete Resnick Message not available Re: Retry question, Bill McQuillan Re: Retry question, Pete Resnick Re: Retry question, Hector Santos Re: Retry question, Pete Resnick Re: Retry question, Hector Santos Re: Retry question, Tony Finch