ietf-smtp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures

2008-08-08 12:48:44

John C Klensin wrote:

So either put these clarifications into a separate draft and try
to advance it or start thinking carefully about what you are
wishing for.

+1.

I would suggest an I-D titled:

      "Improving the reliability of Electronic Mail"

Hopefully more of a technical summary specification, stripped of convoluted conflictive philosophies from mixed disciplines. At the scale we are today, the Consensus (By Osmosis) IETF approach doesn't seem to work too well - it partial explains all the deviant implementations.

In all honesty, another rewrite of the "bible" - hosting requirements guideline RFC 1113 would be a god-send.

The (rhetorical) question of the day would be, with RFC 2821bis alone, would a new fresh engineer today be able to write an SMTP server or client with the basic requirements all figured out?

For me, an opinion, 2821bis would be the end of line - a stripped down, rewrite is most likely the best thing that can happen for future generation SMTP developers.

--
Sincerely

Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>