ned+ietf-smtp(_at_)mrochek(_dot_)com wrote:
Like I said, this gets really twisty.
If you don't read carefully, as I just failed to do, sure. But as long
as you pay attention I don't think this is all that tricky. The fact
> that servers can and sometimes do send ill-advised responses to the
> client is not an excuse for clients attempting to second-guess what
> the server really should have sent.
+1
I don't see any straw man here.
--
Sincerely
Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com