ietf-smtp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question)

2008-08-08 10:31:50

I don't recommend this kind of setup because I get the heebie-jeebies when
I contemplate the possible interoperability problems. Richard's and Ned's
comments above confirm my fears.

Same here. My MTA does single recipient deliveries, which on today's net where the bit rates have increased by orders of magnitude over the past 20 years but the round trip delay hasn't changed at all, typically gets mail delivered faster anyway, while making all of these issues moot.

Nonetheless, multiple recipient deliveries aren't going away, so I think it would be if nothing else a useful exercise to pin down what we think clients should do given various combinations of return codes. Then perhaps we can both see how this compares to what they actually do, and offer some advice to both clients and servers to improve interoperability.

Incidentally, MAAWG is working on a project to clarify the meaning of return codes, and that might be relevant.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl(_at_)taugh(_dot_)com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
"I dropped the toothpaste", said Tom, crestfallenly.