Re: Received,mailbox-list,address-list parsing.


On Thu, 18 Dec 2008, Ivar Lumi wrote:


   ///     For            = CFWS "FOR" FWS ( Path / Mailbox )

Here for can be path / or mailbox, detecting if value is apth or angle-addr
isn't problem. But if value is mailbox.

   ///     mailbox    = name-addr / addr-spec
   ///     name-addr  = [display-name] angle-addr
   ///     angle-addr = [CFWS] "&lt;" addr-spec "&gt;" [CFWS]


No, Path / Mailbox is different from path / mailbox. The title case
versions are defined in RFC 5321 and the lower case versions in RFC 5322.
You are looking at the wrong one.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot(_at_)dotat(_dot_)at>  http://dotat.at/
SOUTH FITZROY: NORTHERLY 3 OR 4, OCCASIONALLY 5 IN SOUTHEAST. ROUGH OR VERY
ROUGH. MAINLY FAIR. MODERATE OR GOOD.

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

Re: Received,mailbox-list,address-list parsing., Ivar Lumi

Next by Date:

Re: Received,mailbox-list,address-list parsing., mouss

Previous by Thread:

Re: Received,mailbox-list,address-list parsing., mouss

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]