Re: RFC 5321bis / 2821ter
2009-01-23 04:54:39
Willie Gillespie writes:
In the interest of learning, how does EHLO help fight spam over HELO?
I thought it just allowed for extensions...?
The EHLO command names the client; the response names extensions. Have a
look at CSV and BATF to see how the name can be used.
Arnt
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RFC 5321bis / 2821ter, John C Klensin
- Re: RFC 5321bis / 2821ter, Willie Gillespie
- Re: RFC 5321bis / 2821ter,
Arnt Gulbrandsen <=
- Re: RFC 5321bis / 2821ter, Paul Smith
- Re: RFC 5321bis / 2821ter, Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: RFC 5321bis / 2821ter, Paul Smith
- Re: RFC 5321bis / 2821ter, Alessandro Vesely
- Re: RFC 5321bis / 2821ter, David MacQuigg
- Re: RFC 5321bis / 2821ter, John C Klensin
- Re: RFC 5321bis / 2821ter, David MacQuigg
- Re: RFC 5321bis / 2821ter, Alex van den Bogaerdt
- Re: RFC 5321bis / 2821ter, John C Klensin
- Re: RFC 5321bis / 2821ter, David MacQuigg
|
|
|