Dave CROCKER wrote:
Just to make this explicit, SM's note is to the rest of you, not to me.
I asked him to solicit comments from the group, since I have only tried
to make the document parrot what I8N folk say. My own comprehension of
the topic remains muddled.
Mine is similarly muddled, but I wonder...is it appropriate to reference a
recent (and presumably temporary) experiment alongside documenting the
current state of the art? Particularly when email-arch is unlikely to be
updated for another five years?
My inclination would be to leave the text as is, perhaps adding that there's
Return Path Inc