G'day.
It's Monday. I'm feeling aggressive...
Once upon a time, it was deemed important to respond after crlf.crlf as quick as
possible. Pausing for additional processing of varying complexity and delay was
deemed unacceptable.
There seems to be an emerging constituency that thinks this stricture is not
applicable to modern email services.
I did a 10-second scan of 5321 and didn't find the relevant text, but I'd like
to resolve -- and preferably squash -- this issue quickly.
Can folks offer pointers to normative language?
Thanks.
d/
ps. Yes, there is a differential to my aggressiveness.
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net