Re: Processing after the end of DATA

On 8/9/2010 5:25 PM, Steve Atkins wrote:
> > Can folks offer pointers to normative language?
> Tail end of section 6.1 of 5321:
>
> "To avoid receiving duplicate messages as the result of timeouts, a
>     receiver-SMTP MUST seek to minimize the time required to respond to
>     the final<CRLF>.<CRLF>  end of data indicator. "
>
> However the same section also says:

Thanks!

And, yeah, it might be worth reviewing both normative directives.

d/

--

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net