Re: Processing after the end of DATA

Actually, reading the patent revealed something I'd never known before:Ned's real name.


:-)

<csg>

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Processing after the end of DATA, (continued) Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Dave CROCKER Re: Processing after the end of DATA, John C Klensin Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Tony Hansen Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Hector Santos Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Carl S. Gutekunst Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Hector Santos Re: Processing after the end of DATA, ned+ietf-smtp Re: Processing after the end of DATA, ned+ietf-smtp Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Hector Santos Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Carl S. Gutekunst Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Carl S. Gutekunst <= Re: Processing after the end of DATA, SM Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: Processing after the end of DATA, David MacQuigg Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Carl S. Gutekunst Re: Processing after the end of DATA, David MacQuigg Re: Processing after the end of DATA, John Levine Re: Processing after the end of DATA, David MacQuigg Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Дилян Палаузов Re: Processing after the end of DATA, David MacQuigg Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, Дилян Палаузов