Re: Processing after the end of DATA

We really don't care about the proper SMTP response if it is spam.


I suppose that's the case if you're sure that deferring the processing
will never produce a bounce message.

R's,
John

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Processing after the end of DATA, (continued) Re: Processing after the end of DATA, ned+ietf-smtp Re: Processing after the end of DATA, ned+ietf-smtp Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Hector Santos Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Carl S. Gutekunst Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Carl S. Gutekunst Re: Processing after the end of DATA, SM Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Nathaniel Borenstein Re: Processing after the end of DATA, David MacQuigg Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Carl S. Gutekunst Re: Processing after the end of DATA, David MacQuigg Re: Processing after the end of DATA, John Levine <= Re: Processing after the end of DATA, David MacQuigg Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Дилян Палаузов Re: Processing after the end of DATA, David MacQuigg Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, Дилян Палаузов Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, David MacQuigg Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, Дилян Палаузов Re: Processing after the end of DATA, ned+ietf-smtp Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, John Levine Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, ned+ietf-smtp Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, Dave CROCKER

Previous by Date:	Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Robert A. Rosenberg
Next by Date:	Re: Processing after the end of DATA, John C Klensin
Previous by Thread:	Re: Processing after the end of DATA, David MacQuigg
Next by Thread:	Re: Processing after the end of DATA, David MacQuigg
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]