Re: [ietf-smtp] smtp extension model (was: Re: [Proposal] confusing part

In article <e428b797-a26a-dbb3-ebec-4974c8189e62(_at_)isode(_dot_)com> you 
write:
> > Would it be useful to write an informational rfc "The SMTP Extensions 
> > Model in 2019" to discuss these pitfalls in detail? 5321 2.2 doesn't 
> > have a lot to say about what to do in this case.
> I think it would be a useful document.
Agreed.  There's a lot of folklore that could stand to be written down.

R's,
John

_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
ietf-smtp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp