Re: [ietf-smtp] [Proposal] confusing parts of the mail system, was 250-MARKDOWN
2019-01-30 22:14:47On 30/01/2019 16.02, Brandon Long wrote:
Um, Exchange trashes signatures on forwarding even without BINARYMIME.
I was talking about their hotmail service. That's what I've tested. Don't know about exchange.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ ietf-smtp mailing list ietf-smtp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp
| Previous by Date: | Re: [ietf-smtp] smtp extension model (was: Re: [Proposal] confusing parts of the mail system, was 250-MARKDOWN), John C Klensin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [ietf-smtp] DKIM andsmtp extension model (was: Re: [Proposal] confusing parts of the mail system, was 250-MARKDOWN), John Levine |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [ietf-smtp] [Proposal] confusing parts of the mail system, was 250-MARKDOWN, Brandon Long |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [ietf-smtp] [Proposal] confusing parts of the mail system, was 250-MARKDOWN, valdis . kletnieks |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |