Getting the -01 version posted took longer than expected,
partially because an XML issue (no nested comments and no "--"
in comments) got in the way. No complaints and no one's fault,
but I didn't get it up yesterday as promised.
In any event, it is no up. As explained Monday, no differences
from -00 other than hiding of the comments associated with the
2821->5321 update and transition, a new change log section to
match, and revision of the "Note on Reading..." at the
beginning. I've checked diffs and don't think anything was
changed inadvertently but, if I missed something, it is a bug
and I'd appreciate a report. If you find the full history
useful, read -00.
Again, this is not a proposal, a contribution to a WG, or an
assumption that a WG will be formed (or by what mechanism). It
is just a contribution to give people an idea of what we are up
against, and what at least some of the outstanding issues are,
to consider if there is a proposal to move forward with a
revision.
best,
john
_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
ietf-smtp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp