ietf-xml-mime
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

RE: text/xhtml+xml vs. application/xhtml+xml

2000-10-31 09:48:18
from [Gavin Thomas Nicol] [Permanent Link] 
In effect, application/xml is a proxy for x-whatever1/whatever2+xml,
which by the rules for "x-" (don't interpret it unless you know
what you are doing) can't be treated as XML by ignorant processors.


Right, hence my preference for text/xml and application/foo+xml.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  RE: text/xhtml+xml vs. application/xhtml+xml, Gavin Thomas Nicol
Next by Date:  Re: text/xhtml+xml vs. application/xhtml+xml, John Cowan
Previous by Thread:  Re: text/xhtml+xml vs. application/xhtml+xml, John Cowan
Next by Thread:  Re: text/xhtml+xml vs. application/xhtml+xml, John Cowan
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]