Re: model/uml+xml

At 01/01/10 16:04 +0000, Daniel Biddle wrote:

> I don't believe UML has models in the sense RFC 2077 defines. For
> instance, UML models don't "have scaling or calibration factors which are
> related to physical units (force, momentum, time, velocity, acceleration,
> size, etc.)." [RFC 2077 s.2]
I agree.


> Maybe you should change that example to something more plausible.
> (Sorry, I haven't found any good candidates yet.)
Something like model/x3d ?

Regards,   Martin.