-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Veillard [mailto:veillard(_at_)redhat(_dot_)com]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 4:57 PM
To: Tim Bray
Cc: ietf-xml-mime(_at_)imc(_dot_)org; xml-dev(_at_)lists(_dot_)xml(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML
Procedurally? A new W3C note leading to a tiny 2-page REC,
I'd say. Easier than re-opening either the XML or Namespace
RECs.
Agreed, though there isn't that many WG who can handle this
at the moment, I see only Core, and one may need to apply serious
pressure to get more work added to an existing WG. But who knows ...
Hmmm ..... check out
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/10/29/technology/29WEB.html
"The [MSN vs Opera/Mozilla/etc.] imbroglio was another example of how the
Web is really regulated. It is not a matter of enforcement agencies in
Washington, politicians or lobbyists. Instead, the Internet cops on the
block are mainly a band of elite - and vigilant - software experts who keep
things honest because they have the technical and moral authority. Their
views cannot be ignored."
What's sauce for Microsoft is sauce for the W3C, no?