From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi(_at_)gmx(_dot_)net>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Text/xml with omitted charset parameter
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 04:42:01 +0200
* Michael Brennan wrote:
Mentioning UTF-16 in this example is not absurd at all.
It is at least misleading, since it doesn't say,
this case is invalid and won't work. In fact, it
implies the contrary to me.
When we create a new RFC, we should rename the subsection.
8.5 INCONSISTENT EXAMPLE: Text/xml with Omitted Charset
is better than
8.5 Text/xml with Omitted Charset
Cheers,
Makoto