Re: Draft registration for application/xenc+xml

Joseph Reagle wrote:
> But absent TAG 
> resolution, is anyone opposed to text that states "However, the 
> application/xenc+xml type name MUST only be used for data objects in which 
> the root element is from the XENC namespace."
Seems sensible to me.

> Also, Ian, in [3] what does it mean that the registration should be part of 
> the REC? That I should have an appendix in the spec with a copy of my 
> request? (seems odd...)
I think that's the idea.  Why odd? -Tim