On Friday 24 May 2002 12:21, Tim Bray wrote:
Also, Ian, in [3] what does it mean that the registration should be
part of the REC? That I should have an appendix in the spec with a copy
of my request? (seems odd...)
I think that's the idea. Why odd? -Tim
Not odd, but ....
Is the expectation that there will also be an orthogonal ietf-draft -> RFC
or registration request document? If so, wouldn't a reference to it be
sufficient? (If we're using the registration process, should the TR be
dependent on that process: can't leave CR until the registration is issued?
Or can the WG commit to the registration but the documents don't need to be
inter-dependent? Or will a section within a W3C specification be an
adequate referent for the IANA registry?
--
Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle(_at_)w3(_dot_)org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature/
W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/