At 15:00 02/08/08 -0400, Joseph Reagle wrote:
As Ned and Martin point out, the intent is to express the fact that
"application/xenc+xml" is XML, and consequently shares the same charset and
encoding semantics/processing as that defined in RFC 3023.
Well, what the spec currently writes is okay, but what
you just write above is not:
The intent is to say that application/xenc+xml shares the same
charset behaviour as application/xml defined in RFC 3023.
(text/xml behaves differently)
Regards, Martin.