Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023



On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 14:10:53 -0400
Francois Yergeau <FYergeau(_at_)alis(_dot_)com> wrote:

But stating that "most XML is not text for casual users" says that there is
no loss in deprecating text/*xml (save perhaps transition issues), the text/
top-level buys nothing of value.


Agreed.

-- 
MURATA Makoto <murata(_at_)hokkaido(_dot_)email(_dot_)ne(_dot_)jp>

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023, (continued) Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023, Martin Duerst Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023, Tim Bray Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023, Martin Duerst AddDefaultCharset considered harmful (Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023), Martin Duerst Re: AddDefaultCharset considered harmful (Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023), Tim Bray Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023, John Cowan Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023, Christoph Schneegans Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023, MURATA Makoto RE: Requesting a revision of RFC3023, Francois Yergeau RE: Requesting a revision of RFC3023, Francois Yergeau Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023, MURATA Makoto <= Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023, C. M. Sperberg-McQueen Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023, Tim Bray RE: Requesting a revision of RFC3023, Francois Yergeau RE: Requesting a revision of RFC3023, Simon St.Laurent Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023, MURATA Makoto RE: Requesting a revision of RFC3023, Francois Yergeau Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023, John Cowan Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023, Martin Duerst Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023, Tim Bray Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023, Martin Duerst

Previous by Date:	Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023, MURATA Makoto
Next by Date:	Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023, Bjoern Hoehrmann
Previous by Thread:	RE: Requesting a revision of RFC3023, Francois Yergeau
Next by Thread:	Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023, C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]