The following text at Section 6 is too restrictive in a manner that is both
unnecessary and not consistent with other text (e.g. at Section 5)
The following textual conventions are defined to support unsigned 64-bit
data types for HC-RMON [HC-RMON].
I suggest replacing this text by the following:
The following textual conventions are defined to support unsigned 64-bit
data types for MIBs such as the HC-RMON MIB [HC-RMON].
The reason is that other MIB documents should feel free to use the Textual
Conventions described by this document freely, until a permanent solution is
standardized as part of some evolution of the SNMP SMI.
Regards,
Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [SMTP:bwijnen(_at_)lucent(_dot_)com]
Sent: Mon March 20 2000 20:26
To: mibs(_at_)ops(_dot_)ietf(_dot_)org;
snmpv3(_at_)lists(_dot_)tis(_dot_)com
Subject: FW: Last Call: Textual Conventions for Additional High
Capacity D ata Types to Proposed Standard
Just in case someone missed it.
Bert
----------
From: The IESG[SMTP:iesg-secretary(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org]
Reply To: iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2000 4:43 PM
Cc: kzm(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com
Subject: Last Call: Textual Conventions for Additional High Capacity
Data Types to Proposed Standard
The IESG has received a request to consider Textual Conventions for
Additional High Capacity Data Types <draft-kzm-hcdata-types-05.txt> as
a Proposed Standard. This has been reviewed in the IETF but is not the
product of an IETF Working Group.
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send any comments to the
iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org or ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by April
18, 2000.
Files can be obtained via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kzm-hcdata-types-05.txt