ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Sats vs plain UMTS

2000-04-17 02:50:02
-----Original Message-----
From: Musandu [mailto:musandu(_at_)ARCC(_dot_)OR(_dot_)KE]
Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2000 8:59 AM
To: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Sats vs plain UMTS


Could hand held satelitte phones kill UMTS even before it 
takes root, as the key tools for personal high bandwidth 
internet access?

Yours truly,
Nyagudi Musandu

Extremely unlikely. First, satellite phone systems support 
only low-bitrate data (9.6 kbps). There are planned larger 
bandwidth systems (e.g., Teledesic) but the sat-phone 
business is quite fuzzy following the collapse of Iridium, 
ICO's problems, and constant market repositioning in the
LEOS/MEOS space in which only Globalstar is flying...

Terrestial wireless systems (market leader is now GSM with 
~260 million subscribers and a wide geographical footprint 
except in the Americas) have a huge head start and will very 
likely continue to dominate the market. UMTS is one part of 
the ITU's IMT-2000 family of 3G systems with a limited set 
of radio interfaces (see www.itu.int/imt/ or perhaps 
www.gsmworld.com).

TDMA-based 2.5G systems using GPRS (and perhaps EDGE) will 
clearly be an important mobile data transition platform to 
3G systems (supporting up to 2 Mbps). 3G systems based on 
WCDMA will probably be deployed first in Japan in early 2001. 
One of the first movers will be NTT Docomo: their year-old 
"i-mode" mobile data service, although low-bandwidth, has 
demonstrated the potential market with already around 6 
million subscribers. On that basis, NTT Docomo is now the 
largest ISP in Japan and has over 8,000 i-mode content providers. 
Elsewhere, the bet is on WAP (www.wapforum.com) but expect to 
see much convergence between WAP and "i-mode" (actually a 
simplified HTML) in the next year. 

Bob



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>