Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users

ietf

Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users

2001-01-20 17:30:03

Then it seems we will have to create an ever expanding bandwidth to support
all the overhead associated with NAT and these multiple layers.


bandwidth consumption is the least of the problems. 

actually NATs probably conserve bandwidth because they prevent many kinds
of new applications from being deployed.

Keith

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Number of Firewall/NAT Users, Jiri Kuthan RE: Number of Firewall/NAT Users, Bernard Aboba RE: Number of Firewall/NAT Users, vint cerf RE: Number of Firewall/NAT Users, Bernard D. Aboba RE: Number of Firewall/NAT Users, vint cerf Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users, Jim McMurry Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users, Keith Moore <= Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users, Matt Holdrege Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users, Keith Moore Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users, Matt Holdrege Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users, Keith Moore Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users, Matt Holdrege Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users, Keith Moore Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users, Jon Crowcroft Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users, Brian E Carpenter RE: Number of Firewall/NAT Users, Richard Shockey Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users, Valdis . Kletnieks

Previous by Date:	Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users, Ed Gerck
Next by Date:	Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users, Matt Holdrege
Previous by Thread:	Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users, Jim McMurry
Next by Thread:	Re: Number of Firewall/NAT Users, Matt Holdrege
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]