Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables

It's our collective job to ensure that IPv6 doesn't
leave any of the motivations to do NAT intact.


i suggest that, for most of us, there are more useful and concrete major
direct goals of ipv6 than anti-nat religion.

randy

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, (continued) Message not available Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Eliot Lear Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, V Guruprasad Message not available Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, V Guruprasad Re: WG scope/deliverables, Mark Nottingham Re: WG scope/deliverables, Valdis . Kletnieks Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, David R. Conrad Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Melinda Shore Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Brian E Carpenter Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Randy Bush <= Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Keith Moore Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Randy Bush Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Keith Moore RE: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Bernard Aboba RE: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Randy Bush Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Keith Moore Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Bernard D. Aboba Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, John C Klensin Functionality needed in NATs (Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables), Harald Alvestrand Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Brian E Carpenter

Previous by Date:	Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Brian E Carpenter
Next by Date:	Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, V Guruprasad
Previous by Thread:	Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Brian E Carpenter
Next by Thread:	Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Keith Moore
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]