Questions. Is it a good tradition to form a 'design team'
in a WG and to let that group design something excluding
the rest of the WG, and to accept the design result
as a WG official opinion ?
Second one. Is it a good tradition not to ask consensus
from the audience at the IETF meeting site, if the design
team is made of 'core and active' members in it ?
Final one. Is it a good tradition to consume most of the
meeting time in debating technical matters of an ID,
between the AUTHORS of that ID ?
PS. What rights does a WG chair have ?
I hope this coming IETF meeting opens its door to all.
many replies plz.
Thank you so much.
Jiwoong