Keith Moore wrote:
not pointing the finger at any one in particular ... but I'm continunally
amazed when competent engineers who routinely make difficult compromises when
designing computer protocols, are seemingly unable to understand the concept
of compromise regarding meeting arrangements.
At least in regards to meeting sites, we've got rough consensus and
'running code'. What should amaze even more is competent engineers
who appear to believe meeting site assignment isn't already a function
of compromise.
cheers,
gja