ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: money

2001-05-31 10:50:02
Hmmmm,

I like all the Mathematical theories on how to figure this out. I have
one, its a protocol:

I suggest you use the Giant Circular Trashcan or (GCT) method for
delivery. I would even go so far as to provide an extension to this
protocol using GCT-TE to enable a pre-engineered path to the
destination. 

Either way, I believe this to be a full proof.

Cheers,

Alexander G. Paoli
alex(_dot_)paoli(_at_)netconstruct(_dot_)net 

-----Original Message-----
From: Valdis(_dot_)Kletnieks(_at_)vt(_dot_)edu 
[mailto:Valdis(_dot_)Kletnieks(_at_)vt(_dot_)edu]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 7:05 PM
To: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: money 


On Wed, 30 May 2001 16:09:43 EDT, Betty 
<betty(_at_)wheelweb(_dot_)zzn(_dot_)com>  said:
Those 100 people mail out 5,000 e-mails each for a total of 500,000
e-mails. 
The 0.2% response to that is 1000 orders for Report # 3. 
Those 1000 people send out 5,000 e-mails each for a total of 5 million
e-mails 
sent out. The 0.2% response to that is 10,000 orders for Report # 4. 
Those 10,000 people send out 5,000 e-mails each for a total of
50,000,000 
(50 million) e-mails. The 0.2% response to that is 100,000 orders for
Report 
# 5 THAT'S 100,000 ORDERS TIMES $5 EACH=$500,000.00 (half million). 
Your total income in this example is: 1..... $50 + 2..... $500 +
3..... $5,000 + 4 
.... $50,000 + 5..... $500,000 ........ Grand Total=$555,550.00 
NUMBERS DO NOT LIE. GET A PENCIL & PAPER AND FIGUREOUT 
THE WORST POSSIBLE RESPONSES AND NO MATTER HOW YOU 
CALCULATE IT, YOU WILL STILL MAKE A LOT OF MONEY ! 

OK.. Do I calculate return using an exponential curve or the S-shaped
logistics curve?  It seems that the former is only appropriate if we
assume that people will reply to duplicate postings (since the 10,000
people will certainly NOT choose non-overlapping lists of people).

Of course, the average net.moron will take the fact that he's gotten
4 or 5 copies as proof that it works, not as proof that it can't work.
Also, doing the math for report #6 is.. umm.. painful ;)

/Valdis (who had to find *some* way to put an engineering spin on it)

Attachment: Alexander G. Paoli.vcf
Description: Alexander G. Paoli.vcf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>