NTSC vs. PAL
VHS vs. BETAMAX
IPv8 vs. IPv6
What happens when a group of BETAMAX advocates arrive at a meeting
and discover that the host of the meeting supplies them with a VHS player ?
----------------------------------
as a temporary measure I have configured tunnel to IIJ Palo Alto device.
the IPv6 prefix for the meeting room is 3ffe:507:1ff::/64.
it would be, of course, better to have ipv6 prefix from microsoft
research :-)
today we've got a router operated by MS research guys, using 6to4.
so my router have went away.
2002:836b:2505:5::/64
----------------------------------
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf/Current/msg12213.html
2002:<IPv4>:0000:<IPv8> vs. 3FFE:<IPv6>
...more TLDs....more address spaces.....more freedom...
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
Jim Fleming
http://www.unir.com/images/architech.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/address.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/headers.gif
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/sdks/platform/tpipv6/start.asp
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ipng(_at_)sunroof(_dot_)eng(_dot_)sun(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-ipng(_at_)sunroof(_dot_)eng(_dot_)sun(_dot_)com]On Behalf Of
itojun(_at_)iijlab(_dot_)net
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 1:17 PM
To: ipng(_at_)sunroof(_dot_)eng(_dot_)sun(_dot_)com;
ngtrans(_at_)sunroof(_dot_)eng(_dot_)sun(_dot_)com
Subject: Re: IPv6 @ interim meeting
as a temporary measure I have configured tunnel to IIJ Palo Alto device.
the IPv6 prefix for the meeting room is 3ffe:507:1ff::/64.
it would be, of course, better to have ipv6 prefix from microsoft
research :-)
today we've got a router operated by MS research guys, using 6to4.
so my router have went away.
2002:836b:2505:5::/64
itojun
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to
majordomo(_at_)sunroof(_dot_)eng(_dot_)sun(_dot_)com
--------------------------------------------------------------------
----- Original Message -----
From: <joaquin(_dot_)riverarodriguez(_at_)telefonica-data(_dot_)com>
To: "Einar Stefferud" <stef(_at_)nma(_dot_)com>
Cc: <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 2:35 AM
Subject: Re: "end-to-end" is important....Re: OPES is evil incarnate
And so:-)... May the best technology win!
In general, the best does win, in due course;-)...\Stef
Once upon a time.... there where three home video systems: System 2000 was
the
best technology, more information recorded, better quality....but too
expensive.
It died. Then there was the Beta system, a good technology with fine
picture
definition and not so expensive equipment and tapes....but SONY didn't
want to
release the patent, so the market killed it. The last one, the worst one,
the
one keeping less information was VHS.
Has anybody seen a VCR other than VHS on the last 10 years?
Does the best win?
Remember.... The Good, The Bad and the Ugly; Unix,Windows and MSDOS.
Does the best win?
I tent to believe that markets choose the one to win on every field, and
unfortunately most times the chosen one is not that who holds the best
technology.
Regards,
j.r.
