http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/759/ipj_3-1/ipj_3-1_routing.html
"The "6to4" transition mechanism, "Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4
Clouds without Explicit Tunnels" [6] , provides a solution to the complexity
problem of using manually configured tunnels by specifying a unique routing
prefix for each end-user site that carries an IPv4 tunnel endpoint address."
"It should also be noted that each end-user site with as little as a single
IPv4 address has a unique, routable, IPv6 site routing prefix thanks to the
6to4 transition mechanism."
--------
"A solution to the complexity problem...."
Is this an IETF solution to a "complexity problem" which the IETF created ?
If the IETF is so cluefull, how could it create complex problems in the
first place ?
Does the IETF create problems and then find solutions "elsewhere", and
then claim to have also created solutions to complex problems ?
------
"thanks to the 6to4 transition mechanism"
"thanks to" the IETF ?
Jim Fleming
http://www.unir.com
Mars 128n 128e
http://www.unir.com/images/architech.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/address.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/headers.gif
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/sdks/platform/tpipv6/start.asp
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf/Current/msg12213.html
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf/Current/msg12223.html
