Re: Attachment Stripped in Transaction

ietf

Re: Attachment Stripped in Transaction

2001-08-01 13:00:02

On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 01:45:01PM -0400, John C Klensin wrote:

Personally, I tend to agree -- on logical, moral, and technical
grounds and without needing to appeal to amateur lawyering or
copyright hair-splitting.  Any given submission should either go
through or be diverted, not "improved" by any process not under
the author's control.


Really!  Shades of the OPES debate.

..Scott

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Attachment Stripped in Transaction, Robert Moskowitz Re: Attachment Stripped in Transaction, John C Klensin Re: Attachment Stripped in Transaction, Meritt James Re: Attachment Stripped in Transaction, Vernon Schryver Re: Attachment Stripped in Transaction, John C Klensin Re: Attachment Stripped in Transaction, Scott Brim <= Re: Attachment Stripped in Transaction, Vernon Schryver Re: Attachment Stripped in Transaction, Sean Doran Re: Attachment Stripped in Transaction, Keith Moore

Previous by Date:	Re: Attachment Stripped in Transaction, John C Klensin
Next by Date:	recruitList, fdsa
Previous by Thread:	Re: Attachment Stripped in Transaction, John C Klensin
Next by Thread:	Re: Attachment Stripped in Transaction, Vernon Schryver
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]